From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 9 18:05:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437B2106564A; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:05:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cbuechler@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBDD8FC0C; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so1113151wwf.31 for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 11:05:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ScnuFe5sjYaooLFfAijSYUWLE9c++P4oSLdoxH+hTQo=; b=E39Mr0xHFZsDvu6oDH/sQpTLj1kqQbuzD/2I+ajI6Lc8xPn5ilyewpvTyIxciJS/m3 7FVU3hccyq+ux8D3vgMJ8THIa6ZwcwgvtYHxuZT5qNxmprleE+3fuzYAW/xsKKC4IeA9 +cJVRrjwRu9weaL0hM5YuGzwJSkRumFYXwXCE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=TveDPkNo4te+CYgJ/EUeRtKs5y4PG3aRczy50CC8z4Yn+RuQwPOiVgAkp+QTn/7XgS J845+m4vG5zCKrUIxhGK04CX4NA4Gq6o6Z1dsaDd3TLVfW2Px2HCHQGqLpUauW7+9hyi cQy7I3jal1kOfsjQ5Wd0ppFHLeZa9OHqXEJVs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.81.209 with SMTP id m59mr4598631wee.15.1278698712076; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 11:05:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.181.196 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:05:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C3631F4.4090504@gmail.com> <20100708215554.GH9303@michelle.cdnetworks.com> Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:05:12 -0400 Message-ID: From: Chris Buechler To: Jack Vogel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: pyunyh@gmail.com, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= , net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: page fault in igb on 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:05:20 -0000 On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > Is this kernel 32 bit? It does exactly the same with 32 and 64 bit. > And is my code altered, it seemed some debug I saw > was > not familiar. Nothing in sys/dev/e1000 is changed. Copying Ermal who wrote most/many of the changes. They don't touch anything in igb, so it should be the same as stock 8.1. I'm having a stock 8.1-RC2 installed to verify that. > Last, can you try the code in HEAD to see if it changes > anything. > Will try that next, thanks. Chris