From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Dec 23 21:28:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA11274 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 23 Dec 1998 21:28:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ol.kyrnet.kg (ol.kyrnet.kg [195.254.160.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA11184 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 1998 21:28:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fygrave@tigerteam.net) Received: from gizmo.kyrnet.kg (IDENT:fygrave@gizmo.kyrnet.kg [195.254.160.13]) by ol.kyrnet.kg (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA05336; Thu, 24 Dec 1998 09:55:59 +0600 Received: from localhost (fygrave@localhost) by gizmo.kyrnet.kg (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA16269; Thu, 24 Dec 1998 10:25:46 +0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gizmo.kyrnet.kg: fygrave owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 10:25:46 +0500 (KGT) From: CyberPsychotic X-Sender: fygrave@gizmo.kyrnet.kg To: John Polstra cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LD_PRELOAD similarities. In-Reply-To: <199812240123.RAA00351@vashon.polstra.com> Message-ID: Confirm-receipt-to: fygrave@usa.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ~ No, we don't have anything like that. oh.. well, pity. Then I will probably have to change SHELLLVL to 2, so user will not be able to modify LD_PRELOAD setting, right? ~ > (*) Is BSDi compatible with FreeBSD here? (seems not quite, since ~ > whether I try to set LD_PRELOAD variable on BSDi machine, it makes ~ > no effect). ~ ~ That's really a BSDi question, and I don't know the answer to it. I ~ believe that our LD_PRELOAD support does the "standard" thing. ~ Yep. Probably. I just hoped some people here expirienced with both FreeBSD and BSDi clone. Well, manual seems to mention LD_PRELOAD thing, but ktrace doesn't show that it reacts on it in any sort of way. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message