From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Nov 24 12:19:15 1995
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA18626
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 24 Nov 1995 12:19:15 -0800
Received: from cdp.igc.apc.org (cdp.igc.apc.org [192.82.108.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA18618
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 24 Nov 1995 12:19:03 -0800
Received: from kick.knooppunt.be (kick.knooppunt.be [194.10.201.200]) by cdp.igc.apc.org (8.6.12/Revision: 1.212 ) with ESMTP id MAA08115; Fri, 24 Nov 1995 12:17:58 -0800
Received: (from techno@localhost) by kick.knooppunt.be (8.6.11/8.6.12) id VAA02559; Fri, 24 Nov 1995 21:15:49 GMT
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 1995 21:15:48 +0000 ()
From: Daniel Verhoeven <techno@kick.knooppunt.be>
To: Brian Litzinger <brian@MediaCity.com>
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: subnetting
In-Reply-To: <199511231232.EAA15167@MediaCity.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951124211441.2486A-100000@kick.knooppunt.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Dear,

Net 192.168.32.0 is free available, look at the appropriate RFC's.

Daniel.

On Thu, 23 Nov 1995, Brian Litzinger wrote:

> > 
> > Dear Friends,
> > 
> > I switched from useing routed to gated on a FreeBSD 2.0.5. We have a PPP 
> > link over a leased line to our provider. But we only have one real 
> > IP-number, namely 194.10.201.200.
> > 
> > We have a small local Ip-network on ethernet (ed0), using the fake net 
> > 192.168.31 and we have three dialin modems for PPP (using ppp for 
> > cleint-ppp) setting up links between:
> > 
> > 192.168.32.254 <-> 192.168.32.1
> > 192.168.32.254 <-> 192.168.32.2
> > 192.168.32.254 <-> 192.168.32.2
> 
> >  [stuff deleted]
> 
> > When I used routed, defining some static routes, I could ping from within 
> > the network to outside. This isn't possible anymore. Can someone help us. 
> > We are the system of the Association for Progressive Communication in 
> > Belgium.
> > Daniel Verhoeven.
> 
> I'm not an expert, but 
> 
>    1. I'm surprised this ever worked.
> 
>    2. Isn't the owner of net 192.168.32.0 going to be upset?
> 
> -- 
> Brian Litzinger <brian@mediacity.com>
> http[s]://www.mpress.com  
> speakfree.mpress.com, videomsg.mpress.com
>