From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jun 13 20: 0: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2620137BE0F for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 20:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id UAA26246; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 20:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 20:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200006140300.UAA26246@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Will Andrews Subject: Re: ports/19238: sgmltools1 Reply-To: Will Andrews Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/19238; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Will Andrews To: justas@mbank.lv Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/19238: sgmltools1 Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 22:52:36 -0400 On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 11:25:53AM +0300, justas@mbank.lv wrote: > >Synopsis: sgmltools1 Is there some reason why this should be imported; i.e. why should we have a sgmltools1 port when we already have an up-to-date sgmltools? -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message