From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 8 07:36:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38BF16A4CE for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 07:36:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web26802.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web26802.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.176.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D682443D3F for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 07:36:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cguttesen@yahoo.dk) Received: (qmail 73010 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Feb 2005 07:36:56 -0000 Message-ID: <20050208073656.73008.qmail@web26802.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [194.248.174.58] by web26802.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 08:36:56 CET Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:36:56 +0100 (CET) From: Claus Guttesen To: supraexpress@globaleyes.net, freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050208034855.D211E43D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: The case for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 07:36:57 -0000 > One of the main "stumbling blocks" to using FreeBSD > is the installation > process. I have had "lots of fun" (not!) with > NetBSD's line-mode/shell-script > "installer" and confusing companion installation > instructions, in the past; I > only tried OpenBSD once and don't remember anything > about its installation > process, but I seem to recall that it was similar to > NetBSD's; FreeBSD's > 'DOS-like menu' system is a travisty and IS PROBABLY > THE ONE THING THAT TURNS > OFF MORE PROSPECTIVE FBSD USERS THAN ANYTHING ELSE - > I know - I have heard! I may be doing something which I'm not supposed to, but I've been trying (very hard since I'm not used to Linux anymore ;-) to install Linux on our Dell 2850 with a Perc-controller to do some comparative measurements. Gentoo, nice but tedious installer, way too much manual typing, installed, but refused to boot. Slackware, did not detect the Perc-controller, ubuntu did not either, Suse stops during the installation-process. 5.3 (i386) install's without problems, the amd64-installer needs some tweaking (set hw.physmem="2G") at the boot prompt which may hinder some folks from trying FreeBSD out. My point is that Linux seems to have it's own rough edges. regards Claus