From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 4 02:43:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67F437B401; Sun, 4 May 2003 02:43:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from builder.freebsdmall.com (builder.freebsdmall.com [65.86.180.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3401743FBD; Sun, 4 May 2003 02:43:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murray@builder.freebsdmall.com) Received: (from root@localhost) by builder.freebsdmall.com (8.12.9/8.11.6) id h449hmNm067687; Sun, 4 May 2003 02:43:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murray) Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 02:43:48 -0700 From: Murray Stokely To: Dmitry Morozovsky Message-ID: <20030504024348.P480@freebsdmall.com> References: <200305040451.h444p9p2017132@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030504130818.S29874@woozle.rinet.ru> <20030504132827.G29874@woozle.rinet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="m51xatjYGsM+13rf" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030504132827.G29874@woozle.rinet.ru>; from marck@rinet.ru on Sun, May 04, 2003 at 01:29:30PM +0400 X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/share/mk doc.docbook.mk doc.project.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2003 09:43:50 -0000 --m51xatjYGsM+13rf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, May 04, 2003 at 01:29:30PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Oh, and I forgot devel/boehm-gc. Second patch should look like: Again, these shouldn't be strictly necessary. Can you please backup your claim that make release is broken? I do not think that is the case (well, at least not because of the docs, the floppies may still be overflowing). The whole point of Makefile.inc.docports is to list the MINIMAL number of docports that are required for a release build (as opposed to the full docproj port). Please explain. - Murray --m51xatjYGsM+13rf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQE+tODUtNcQog5FH30RAt/yAJ9+MBBZFnnB2nLpZeMxgzuocmOSKQCgtt/Z Mi4IATpTh36gLqOCmkEfYAI= =IaJd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --m51xatjYGsM+13rf--