From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 07:09:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04431135 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.laposte.net (smtpoutz11.laposte.net [194.117.213.174]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7BD5C68 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.laposte.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lpn-prd-vrout003 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A5042A27C2 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:08:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.laposte.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lpn-prd-vrout003 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0044342A2B70 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:08:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=laposte.net; s=mail1; t=1427872134; bh=raa56fx+ZBPsszgabnzcSyeCuF9VCSQqnlERya74Xng=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject; b=pCh0pLXoxE/+A8FfuB39A6yUSV/LQgh5ljcEYUn8SzBOe8XTCRTYtpqfcGPS/rw7Z jTPqcpo/12V/zgbgYniWA8szzIRi6s39O5ucgdilth5dJOhprvkE0rRMyOjrrCe+9d xZH6rcYejhSS22ud85gGq6eUW4MQ0JhVn/dxwgkdqs5UAEOXiQMZgt/YlIja/78ixn yD54hcw6+s7wBsF8TJa02wJLxHOJTM97UetThUmdb4zguciSubGoYKFJjSOnUWw0AT nvc5Y415yP2DAY2KxNth2hy1tHBrmSP9K1zs+fIRNX89FHGLki5wejdMfwNwiv6izH FquRRUQxiA1QA== Received: from lpn-prd-mstr033.laposte (lpn-prd-mstr033.laposte [10.128.59.34]) by lpn-prd-vrout003 (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E8142A1F28; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:08:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:08:53 +0200 (CEST) From: sg-ball@laposte.net To: Baptiste Daroussin Message-ID: <2106067877.31883344.1427872133869.JavaMail.zimbra@laposte.net> In-Reply-To: <20150331223320.GJ30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <902242756.31277524.1427836544530.JavaMail.zimbra@laposte.net> <1476070491.31317997.1427838521190.JavaMail.zimbra@laposte.net> <20150331223320.GJ30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Subject: Re: Problem with pkg behind a chunking proxy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [78.115.104.177] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.6_GA_5922 (ZimbraWebClient - FF36 (Win)/La Poste) Thread-Topic: Problem with pkg behind a chunking proxy Thread-Index: i+Sf1eXkRq7nMwyxhfeUpc7MUDgxnw== X-VR-SrcIP: [78.115.104.177] X-VR-FullState: 0 X-VR-Score: -100 X-VR-Cause-1: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeektddrudelgdduudegucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhl X-VR-Cause-2: vgemucfntefrqffuvffgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdl X-VR-Cause-3: qddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvkfgjfhfugggtgfhiofhtsehtqhgttdertdejnecuhfhrohhmpehs X-VR-Cause-4: ghdqsggrlhhlsehlrghpohhsthgvrdhnvghtnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucfr X-VR-Cause-5: rghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdphhgvlhhopehlphhnqdhprhguqdhmshhtrhdtfeefrdhp X-VR-Cause-6: rhhoshhoughivgdpihhnvghtpedutddruddvkedrheelrdefgedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsghdqsggr X-VR-Cause-7: lhhlsehlrghpohhsthgvrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepfhhrvggvsghsugdqphhkghesfhhrvggvsghs X-VR-Cause-8: ugdrohhrgh X-VR-AvState: No X-VR-State: 0 Cc: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:09:06 -0000 I could join to GitHub, fork pkg and commit the patch to my fork (https://g= ithub.com/sg-ball/pkg), but it is still untested and I wonder if the displa= y "file: 0%" that directly goes to 100% is acceptable. Anyway, thanks for you quick anwser Serge ----- Mail original -----=20 De: "Baptiste Daroussin" =20 =C3=80: sg-ball@laposte.net=20 Cc: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org=20 Envoy=C3=A9: Mercredi 1 Avril 2015 00:33:20=20 Objet: Re: Problem with pkg behind a chunking proxy=20 > ...=20 > I think this feature could be interesting since Transfer-Encoding: chunke= d is valid as HTTP 1.1 but I'm not used to submitting patches even if I've = been using FreeBSD since release 3.x=20 ...=20 So usually the feature should be discussed in pkg@FreeBSD.org or in #pkgng= =20 (freenode) or on github issue, I have to confess that I do track more often= =20 github issue tracker than freebsd's bugzilla for pkg related issues. (which= is=20 bad I should more track both).=20 Concerning your feature it is very welcome :) usually we do like pull reque= st on=20 github. Note that you are just in time for pkg 1.5 which will be released s= oon :)=20 The preferred way is usually pull request, but I'm flexible if the submitte= r is=20 anti github then I can just grab patches.=20 That part of the code hasn't been modified since pkg 1.4 so the patch shoul= d=20 apply just fine.=20 ...=20 So as a conclusion first make a pull request on github, then once it is wel= l=20 tested enough you can provide a patch for base (or I'll do) if so open a ti= cket=20 in the bug tracker for base and do not hesitate to harass me :)=20 Thanks again,=20 Bapt=20