From owner-freebsd-questions Mon May 21 5:47:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.gti.net (apollo.gti.net [199.171.27.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFD637B424 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 05:47:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from y3k@gti.net) Received: from sludge.amc-inc.com (unknown [208.216.122.103]) by apollo.gti.net (mail) with ESMTP id CCE04145944; Mon, 21 May 2001 08:47:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 07:40:57 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: Mark Yeck From: Mark Yeck To: Evren Yurtesen Subject: RE: uptime limits Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Netcraft says that? Their own longest uptime list is dominated by FreeBSD machines with uptimes far longer than 497 days. http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html From what I understand, recent versions of FreeBSD dont report their uptime to netcraft at all. -mark On 21-May-01 Evren Yurtesen wrote: > Hi, > I have heard hmm actually read at www.netcraft.com that FreeBSD doesnt > show uptimes longer than 497 days and the uptime information would come > back to 0 (especially in recent releases) > is this true or? isnt that a shame on us if we cant prove our uptimes? =) > > Evren > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message