Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 09:49:53 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237642] x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati: Upgrade from 18.1.0 to 19.0.0 results in invisible mouse pointer Message-ID: <bug-237642-7141-T3kHkXROVi@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237642-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237642-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237642 --- Comment #26 from Niclas Zeising <zeising@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Alexey Dokuchaev from comment #25) So, something we do wrt. return values from the ioctl() is different from w= hat linux does. Is there any way to check the return value and print/log it somewhere? I think you can use xf86DrvMsg for this. You'll find how they = work starting here: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/blob/master/hw/xfree86/common= /xf86Helper.c#L999 Something like xf86DrvMsg(pScrn->scrnIndex, X_INFO, ...) could work, I gues= s.=20 The rest of the call is a regular printf() format string I think. I'm wondering if the call DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CURSOR2 is failing, but before your patch the code path that sets use_set_cursor2 to false isn't taken. With y= our patch we instead fall back to use DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CURSOR, and that ioctl wor= ks Thanks for helping out! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237642-7141-T3kHkXROVi>