From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 23 18:30:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6F8BE6E62 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:30:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jev@ecadlabs.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63377A71 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:30:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jev@ecadlabs.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x229.google.com with SMTP id w11so144158064oia.2 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:30:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ecadlabs.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=t6qB8PBSdBSz9Qt0P04rdryNkO7249e2Qvy6eU5bRTk=; b=jzkNGJ+V8GQEF/jWtK2a9TQtoOGh/u4Ky+dzuHJ04oFK7brwku+7H8hNf0X66PE3cT rUC2mONu4KLHt5a9Xzvqy6i9JCrJ+v0bGn1uKDP4rZyD3Dew9nwpjA8uUfXiZAKvMPnn aiIipNUHXD+5f0VuwQe0VRzKJu2wJZso3vrzqEfK4wR26lVHdZkxpTTGXkO86DMenEXw 4aIxRuvxK606gulrWOoHLUkNJ6aGrw3MShMyW1gW+J3eQAJCqtADWuLZ9B2f+uBHRsOH 3mcUkgwEGhdjno7UF/1Bg+tRd3x3+LV704VewHEHI1jNBk5j6ljRnHU2YCtLMOAx+iQM hNhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=t6qB8PBSdBSz9Qt0P04rdryNkO7249e2Qvy6eU5bRTk=; b=W/sHJ8XxFT0gVOr/mzOXT1oxmZjOdvMqHQebYPnErx+lhg/RLxQ72O5wsRZLbI6z8Y A9eEf56gFYHkgcCoVSS1GoKTwcagm4LkMbBzZCxoaKJwCkBL/gtGHzbo34mGWuYvsxjv hX3vrqy5/WZMzhKpxFRbyrJE+2sg+JqGX4zNs68IIQnQvXfTfBPgvfnKc/yX5MH6+izQ UKjXuIEKvKR6xjCOc4r6TBnq8D33QxVEFyT5zFbEglfisSP2k/9cDL5CKnH5TaBGGVy0 ULxHu2y2nFLtv0KzZwQpXFD5saS4VjM/NXsBvSILMp+EtAm0KSe/XnUYbxVfaXbyu+vS jDVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPWvUiBw8mgwAkIO9kiMPal5uDjkZROQyLdM6NxjmbSo+bvHnniB4GK2fVWveie3U77JR00r7TC4C/vlVWc X-Received: by 10.202.205.132 with SMTP id d126mr12846833oig.170.1474655439601; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:30:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3ef6ea87-0a2c-e87e-66e2-535c11d01ed1@FreeBSD.org> <2177a1e7-fa9f-4707-5a6b-7b0bd01b02af@mezonplus.ru> <82026752-a388-a3c0-6fe7-4766db9096ac@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <82026752-a388-a3c0-6fe7-4766db9096ac@FreeBSD.org> From: Jev Bjorsell Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:30:29 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Differences when using `make` V `port test` To: Mathieu Arnold , Alexander Moisseev , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:30:40 -0000 Thanks for the help. I made some adjustments, and now both my pending ports are passing `poudriere testport`. Could someone please commit; https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212468 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212467 Thanks all! Jev On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:08 AM Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 23/09/2016 =C3=A0 15:26, Alexander Moisseev via freebsd-ports a =C3=A9= crit : > > On 23.09.2016 15:45, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >> > >> I don't really know what it does, but to test a port, it seems > >> overcomplicated, everything is already done by the framework. > >> > >> Best would be for you to put: > >> > >> DEVELOPER=3Dyes > >> > >> in /etc/make.conf > >> > >> and simply run "make" as a regular user, it will check everything that > >> can be. > >> > > I believe the most important difference is "port test" does real > > install (into a temp dir) and deinstall, "make" doesn't (merely staging= ). > > I don't really see a point in really installing the port, the only thing > this achieve is test pkg add works. > > These days, it is better to use poudriere testport[1] to test your work. > At least you can be certain everything is ok. > > 1: > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.h= tml > > -- > Mathieu Arnold > > >