From owner-freebsd-bugs  Fri Sep 19 22:13:14 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA04772
          for bugs-outgoing; Fri, 19 Sep 1997 22:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usr02.primenet.com (tlambert@usr02.primenet.com [206.165.6.202])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA04767;
          Fri, 19 Sep 1997 22:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from tlambert@localhost)
	by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA17696;
	Fri, 19 Sep 1997 22:12:59 -0700 (MST)
From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Message-Id: <199709200512.WAA17696@usr02.primenet.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in malloc/free
To: grog@lemis.com (Greg Lehey)
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 05:12:58 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, nsmart@iona.com, Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com,
        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <19970920094155.13744@lemis.com> from "Greg Lehey" at Sep 20, 97 09:41:55 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> But how can you ship a product that's full of bugs?

At a guess?

Compete with Microsoft, instead of trying to drive all of the other
poor UNIX schmucks out of business instead.  Then you can do what
Microsoft does.

Oh, wait!  That would require adherence to standards, and none of
these idiotic "value added" "standard plus extensions" things that
make it so UNIX from different vendors is not interoperable...
forget I said anything.  8-|.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.