From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 17 06:59:51 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A0AEBB5
 for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 06:59:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from butcher-nb.yandex.net (hub.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:88])
 by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EC84494;
 Fri, 17 Oct 2014 06:59:50 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5440BDF5.7090101@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:57:57 +0400
From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Pokala, Ravi" <rpokala@panasas.com>, 
 "freebsd-geom@freebsd.org" <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Minor addition to confdot (w/ patch)
References: <D065BA81.120898%rpokala@panasas.com>
In-Reply-To: <D065BA81.120898%rpokala@panasas.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
 <freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-geom>,
 <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
 <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 06:59:51 -0000

On 17.10.2014 05:10, Pokala, Ravi wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> The GEOM stack diagrams created by 'sysctl -b kern.geom.confdot' (and then
> run through `dot') are really quite handy. One thing that we really needed
> at Panasas, but which is not included in the diagram, is the providers'
> sectorsize and stripesize. This small change adds that info; if there are
> no objections, could someone submit it on my behalf?

Hi,

committed with r273208.

-- 
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov