From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 3 18:31:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E6616A400; Wed, 3 May 2006 18:31:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7501E43D46; Wed, 3 May 2006 18:31:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F571A3C2F; Wed, 3 May 2006 11:31:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B524C515D5; Wed, 3 May 2006 14:31:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 14:31:04 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dmitry Morozovsky Message-ID: <20060503183104.GA31055@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200605022352.k42Nqi1s095377@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060503172526.H98950@woozle.rinet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060503172526.H98950@woozle.rinet.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Tor Egge , cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ffs ffs_snapshot.c ffs_vnops.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 18:31:05 -0000 --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 05:36:57PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Dear Tor, >=20 > On Tue, 2 May 2006, Tor Egge wrote: >=20 > TE> Modified files: > TE> sys/ufs/ffs ffs_snapshot.c ffs_vnops.c=20 > TE> Log: > TE> Close a race when VOP_LOCK() on a snapshot file is attempted at the > TE> same time as it is changed back into a normal file. The locker wou= ld > TE> get the shared "snaplk" lock which would no longer be the correct l= ock > TE> for the vnode. >=20 > Any chance this (and subsequent) change(s) would fix snaplk errors report= ed by=20 > me? How can I help testing (patch applied cleanly, but I hesitate to test= it=20 > blindly ;) It does not, but these are some related issues found while testing. Kris --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEWPboWry0BWjoQKURAiN5AKDg84SM0zjYI3U3dSt0uuTRYxknsACfXu5Q l3eHsnI3Y/XEgeWv1Kci8vA= =q8zl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --huq684BweRXVnRxX--