From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jul 12 12:31:54 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA09124 for isp-outgoing; Fri, 12 Jul 1996 12:31:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etinc.com ([204.141.95.6]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA09115 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 1996 12:31:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dialup-usr11.etinc.com (dialup-usr11.etinc.com [204.141.95.132]) by etinc.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA14518 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 1996 15:36:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 15:36:55 -0400 Message-Id: <199607121936.PAA14518@etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.0.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis) Subject: Re: Linux vs. FreeBSD Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Kenneth J Dupuis writes..... >I don't want to start a war but for a new ISP what are the strengths of >FreeBSD? The only thing I know is cdrom.com; enough said! I have years >of experience on Linux, SunOS, Solaris, and AIX. We need something that's >very robust and *secure* (recently had a break-in on a Slackware 3.0 Linux >server). The strengths are that is is faster and more reliable. We support both and Freebsd systems just run like a charm..... Dennis PS: Your mail is broken ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Emerging Technologies, Inc. http://www.etinc.com Synchronous Communications Cards and Routers For Discriminating Tastes. 56k to T1 and beyond. Frame Relay, PPP, HDLC, and X.25 for BSD/OS, FreeBSD and LINUX