From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 15 07:41:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A45106564A for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Anatoliy.Poloz@onetelecom.od.ua) Received: from main.merlin.com.ua (mail.onetelecom.od.ua [91.194.72.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49108FC0A for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.67.100] (unknown [192.168.67.100]) by main.merlin.com.ua (Postmaster) with ESMTP id 3400C5E34C6 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:34:05 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <502B50B8.7010504@onetelecom.od.ua> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:33:12 +0300 From: "Anatoliy.Poloz" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "" References: <61BCA99E-2574-4987-ACD9-E84A3AEBD2A3@ramattack.net> <20120810.034203.52110126.moto@kawasaki3.org> <69EAC334-C51A-4F12-98BE-C25674F10A36@ramattack.net> <20120810.103728.219947649.moto@kawasaki3.org> <000001cd7889$05e15ac0$11a41040$@ezwind.net> <001b01cd7a26$84b62d50$8e2287f0$@ezwind.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Anatoliy.Poloz@onetelecom.od.ua List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:41:47 -0000 15.08.2012 10:25, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre пишет: > > El 14/08/2012, a las 16:10, "Jay West" escribió: > >> Mark Felder wrote... >> ---------------------- >> The xen-tools {port} should include this work. It has nothing to do with what dom0 you're using -- if you don't have a use for this just don't enable it in rc.conf. We could even make it an optional KNOB in the port if necessary. There's just no sound reason why this should be a completely separate port. >> ______________ >> >> Wholeheartedly agree. >> >> Jay West, President >> Open Source Associates, LLC >> PO Box 460454 >> Saint Louis, MO 63146 >> Voice: (314) 262-4143 ext 1000 >> Toll Free: (866) 343-2589 >> Fax: (314) 558- > > Hi, > > It depend's if the dom0 uses xapi or not for being managed... And this scripts mainly maintain xenstore database for info to be exchanged with XenCenter a citrix managing product, this is the main reason because I assume that bare xen-tools shouldn't include XenServerTools's xenstore management scripts for xenstore to be useful with XenCenter. Perhaps using an option for including them or not in the port could be valid too... But I assume the mere fact of using Xentools should not really assume we're going to usr Citrix products... This is my opinion. "Xen Cloud Platform" use XenServerTool's too. > > Best Regards, > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- //wbr Anatoliy Poloz