From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Wed Feb 5 20:40:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302A322D871 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 20:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48CYN70XvGz474k for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 20:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 12A8A22D86F; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 20:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1276F22D86E for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 20:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48CYN66pdwz474j for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 20:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E551B8707 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 20:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 015Ke6P7097043 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 20:40:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 015Ke6ab097042 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 20:40:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 243727] building 12.1-RELEASE-p2 world fails because of dependency to non-existing file libcasper.h Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 20:40:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 20:40:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243727 --- Comment #7 from Mark Johnston --- (In reply to oz42 from comment #4) I understand the proposal. It will cause stale headers to be left behind, which can cause problems of its own. The libcasper issue is simply a bug a= nd should be fixed. We should be copying libcasper.h to the buildworld tmp dir for use during the rest of the build, regardless of whether WITHOUT_CASPER= =3D is set, not relying on its presence in /usr/include/libcasper.h. I verified t= hat this happens at least on head. Some of the other build failures you reported point to some larger underlyi= ng issue. fsck_ffs failed to build because of a inodirty() prototype mismatch, but inodirty() is declared in the fsck_ffs header, not in any system header= s.=20 So clearly there is a problem here that has nothing to do with delete-old. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=