Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 06:11:27 +1100 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: andreas@knobel.gun.de, julian@jhome.dialix.com Cc: cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de, current@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-current-stable ??? Message-ID: <199512171911.GAA17231@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Hi FreeBSD core team ! >> >> [ Possibly I'm speaking for many other people here ] >It's possible. Possibly for non-developers :-). >> >> Generally I would be interested to help testing and debugging new >> FreeBSD-current features. But when reading the -current mailing list, >> FreeBSD-current, so to say FreeBSD-2.2 in it's early days, seems to be ^^^^^^^^^^^ >> an instability nightmare. Perhaps this expression is a bit oversized, >> but please understand my point of view. >I do dissagree. -current is exceptionally stable for what it is... I agree with Julian. >I run -currrent (up until last week) on my machine at TFS.com >and I have had NO troubles with it... I have had only one serious problem (2 core dumps apparently caused by some vm change in the last month). Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512171911.GAA17231>