From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Jan 15 15:25:53 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA06162
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 15:25:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA06137
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 15:25:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.2/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA06963; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 15:25:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 15:25:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu>
X-Sender: dwhite@localhost
Reply-To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
To: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
cc: Brandon Gillespie <brandon@cold.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 'Memory Address' on ethernet cards (NE2000 clones off ed*) 
In-Reply-To: <199701150309.TAA05594@root.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.94.970115152511.5627A-100000@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 14 Jan 1997, David Greenman wrote:

>    Err, that would be 0xd8000 or 0xc8000, but this is all meaningless for
> NE2000's which don't use shared memory.

That's what I thought.  

Thnx for the clarification.

Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | Residence Networking Assistant
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major