Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:07:49 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: Helmut Schneider <jumper99@gmx.de> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cacti broken in 6.3? Message-ID: <20080131080749.GA80783@k7.mavetju> In-Reply-To: <fnqtvv$ot3$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <fnqpqo$a7h$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080130212810.GD37387@k7.mavetju> <fnqtvv$ot3$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:33:37PM +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> wrote: > >On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:22:31PM +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote: > >>I started a long thread at http://forums.cacti.net/about25481.html but > >>it turns out that FreeBSD 6.3 might be the problem. FreeBSD 6.2 and > >>7.0-RC1 (see below) are not affected. Here is what I did: > > > >Silly question from me maybe: did you recompile the net-snmp and > >phpX-snmp libraries? > > Yes, I forced a portupgrade of net-snmp-5.3.2_1 and php5-snmp-5.2.5_1 and I > even completly removed cacti, .*PHP.* and .*snmp.* and did a > 'portinstall -Rf cacti'. I also tried with cacti 0.8.7 and 0.8.6j. I also > dropped the cacti database and recreated it. > > Does your question imply that you are running cacti on 6.3 without problems? No, but I have planned an upgrade of a lot of machines this weekend, including one which runs Cacti :-) The only reason I wondered if net-snmp was recompiled is because it takes some low-level things like CPU usage and memory, so I thought maybe it is related. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080131080749.GA80783>