From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Aug 14 06:15:48 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id GAA28545
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 06:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay6.UU.NET (relay6.UU.NET [192.48.96.16])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA28536
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 06:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ugen-tr by relay6.UU.NET with SMTP 
	(peer crosschecked as: ugen-tr.worldbank.org [138.220.101.58])
	id QQbcsr16749; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 09:15:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 96 09:13:59    
From: "Ugen J.S.Antsilevich" <ugen@latte.worldbank.org>
Subject: RE: ipfw vs ipfilter
To: hackers@freebsd.org
X-PRIORITY: 3 (Normal)
X-Mailer: Chameleon 5.0.1, TCP/IP for Windows, NetManage Inc.
Message-ID: <Chameleon.840028502.ugen@ugen-tr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Heh:) 
Well..intresting enough it always works this way - first ppl take it, then they screw it 
and then they say it's bad and take something else. 
Thanx guys...

G'luck...
--Ugen