From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 12 01:45:35 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF53ABDC;
 Tue, 12 Nov 2013 01:45:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from anubis.delphij.net (anubis.delphij.net [64.62.153.212])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F62C20AE;
 Mon, 11 Nov 2013 23:39:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zeta.ixsystems.com (unknown [69.198.165.132])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by anubis.delphij.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B99B1776A;
 Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:39:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=delphij.net; s=anubis;
 t=1384213147; bh=uKKioD3ECUTb/p/9CU7JNBAnmuI8lzWzF16VVviVHf4=;
 h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
 b=b9lzMxd4JRh9CZSVTj3FRB+Xyvl3BFIEX/vBDq5bc3xWFwDGFuZF6gxz0hNN5zvEN
 sZk7wAIPvDb8rxJJuRe8AgNuwNy8fUXVbe46Dt3+MijmHtiYJLWSqogXUGZOmvW3D4
 n07LVXoOeFxakldlxBVdCyAhsTyeyRQPMGC5zf20=
Message-ID: <52816A9A.4050305@delphij.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:39:06 -0800
From: Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net>
Organization: The FreeBSD Project
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: neel@neelc.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Haswell Kernel Mode Setting
References: <aa01f8714674fb97f0aa96f9bab90968@mail.neelc.org>
In-Reply-To: <aa01f8714674fb97f0aa96f9bab90968@mail.neelc.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
Reply-To: d@delphij.net
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 01:45:35 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 11/11/13 14:29, Neel Chauhan wrote:
> Sorry if I sent a similar patch before. It didn't get accepted so I
> am sending one now. Enjoy.

What does "didn't get accepted" mean? :)  Since this looks like a
PCI-ID only change that do not affect other existing hardware, if it's
not an explicit objection from a reviewer, I think it's Okay to just
go ahead and commit the change after a reasonable timeout instead of
waiting indefinitely.

Cheers,
- -- 
Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net>    https://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve!           Live free or die
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=zbWH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----