Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:27:56 +0200 From: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org> To: Brian Feldman <green@freebsd.org> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: dev_t / udev_t confusion ? Message-ID: <20040609142756.GU9228@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20040609124308.GC11475@green.homeunix.org> References: <53993.1086779790@critter.freebsd.dk> <20040609124308.GC11475@green.homeunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian Feldman wrote: > On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:16:30PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > [...] > > The change proposed is more or less to do: > > s/dev_t/struct cdev */ > > s/udev_t/dev_t/ > > over all the kernel sources (366 files or so). > > [....] > > One yes vote, please. The dev_t structure is not treated as opaque, > so as long as people are going to->dereference it, it deserves to be > a struct *. This reflects what I think perfectly. Cheers, Maxime
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040609142756.GU9228>