From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 19 22:35:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500B71065673 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:35:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0113F8FC15 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so2357894vbm.13 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:35:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=qOOF7n22INP0o0LS4DqpNbbpli4z3weSdL8+zqPubpI=; b=Qn6Z5/lZaO84XDca1HExv2z3ZA5PLud4HFyfJqjhXRxZev/TQTKfAdSVTgwhkmxnIH 8KXmTzWj0Qstn7KGW8whU0zIF0koTaXrItxXX8HBjB+kP3THqqWpL+piJjXrpa13q9+2 HtqZqsEZCy66HLoGqC67/b4wlFiw5GGpT70muzRUSJqJnE0HBNBdEJ5o+qM06+MlkFfl R2qgkCRgNPsNRodXTbgL9eDkCtGJ82FOTi3nWVurszN7OrL/vz+HTRSVPmVZdLZJiACc UMdNe3pIkdJNalgHxERXy9XT5ASITc0r0OoBtv/dk156aGQ1uuheEAuCdDCgK9ZPfT3f F0NA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.26.137 with SMTP id l9mr2231859vdg.62.1348094125103; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:35:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.203.4 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:35:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <780066C6E2FAB67A997876B7@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <20567.50041.903201.979498@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <39B0E74E2DF04033DE7D0080@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:35:25 -0700 Message-ID: From: pete wright To: Walter Hurry Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What replaces csup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:35:26 -0000 On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Walter Hurry wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:26:45 -0600, Warren Block wrote: > >> For ports, it's probably worth saving the distfile directory along with >> local diffs. Move it back into place after the svn checkout of the >> ports tree. > > PMFJI. Newbie here: What's wrong with using SVN for src, and portsnap for > ports? > my personal issue is the fact that csup and portsnap are both part of the base system whereas svn would require installation via ports or the pkg utility. it is frankly a minor inconvenience - and hopefully there will be a csup like utility for svn available in base one day. -pete -- pete wright www.nycbug.org @nomadlogicLA