From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar  4 11:43:19 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359CA106564A
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  4 Mar 2009 11:43:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7E08FC16
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  4 Mar 2009 11:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB076D43F;
	Wed,  4 Mar 2009 11:43:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id EBEE0844C4; Wed,  4 Mar 2009 12:43:17 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Ivan Grover <ivangrvr299@gmail.com>
References: <670f29e20902240717m49f53bfx67166c151c01384b@mail.gmail.com>
	<86eixnfwr2.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<670f29e20902270618m23eed4acg15a8a3e7b43fe327@mail.gmail.com>
	<670f29e20902270810h22adc102rd9500d74208b1f11@mail.gmail.com>
	<86fxhxh2mq.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<670f29e20903032109r7f577b82k59fcec55b0452385@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:43:17 +0100
In-Reply-To: <670f29e20903032109r7f577b82k59fcec55b0452385@mail.gmail.com>
	(Ivan Grover's message of "Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:39:17 +0530")
Message-ID: <86tz69a4yy.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: PAM rules inside pam.d
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:43:19 -0000

Ivan Grover <ivangrvr299@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks for your valuable inputs. The PAM module information is not yet cl=
ear
> for me. The pam_unix, which i debugged was from Linux-PAM-0.78 (www.*linu=
x*
> fromscratch.org/blfs/view/blfs-book-6.0-html/postlfs/*linux*_*pam*.html )

Why?  This is not what FreeBSD uses.

> I think the libraries too belong to the same library. I apologize=EF=BF=
=BD if i
> asked this query to wrong forum.

FreeBSD hasn't used Linux-PAM since 2002 or so.

> Currently i dont see any issues with crypt library as you have suggested.=
 I
> will plan to upgrade the PAM library and see how it goes.

Upgrade what from what to what?

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no