Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 02:08:48 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <oceanare@pacific.net.sg> To: Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg <listsub@401.cx> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SPAM: Score 4.0: Logo contest, and lessons from the XFree86 d ebacle Message-ID: <4210E930.2080500@pacific.net.sg> In-Reply-To: <4210DE89.5060003@401.cx> References: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641AD9@mvaexch01.acuson.com> <4210915F.9060602@401.cx> <2fd864e050214085579b3202a@mail.gmail.com> <4210DE89.5060003@401.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote: > Astrodog wrote: > >> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:54:07 +0100, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg >> <listsub@401.cx> wrote: >> >>> Johnson David wrote: >>> >>>> From: Farid Hajji [mailto:farid.hajji@ob.kamp.net] >>>> >> I would like to point out that Turbo-Linux, BeOS, and OS/2, are all >> currently marketed worse than FreeBSD. ;) > > > And afaik, both BeOS and OS/2 are dead. > None of them died because of inferior quality or lack of innovation. > If I remember right, all of them have good logos. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4210E930.2080500>