From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 14 09:09:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DAD106568B; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:09:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BAD8FC12; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:09:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5A96D41B; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5E57A84513; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:09:21 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Doug Barton References: <200910131851.n9DIpB7P057665@repoman.freebsd.org> <4AD4DE92.3090808@FreeBSD.org> <86iqeietvu.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4AD551E2.3010407@FreeBSD.org> <86tyy2d1si.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4AD55971.3080506@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:09:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4AD55971.3080506@FreeBSD.org> (Doug Barton's message of "Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:54:09 -0700") Message-ID: <86tyy2cpfj.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/varnish Makefile ports/www/varnish/files pkg-message.in varnishd.in varnishlog.in varnishncsa.in X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:09:23 -0000 Doug Barton writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > That's a lot of extra code for no perceivable benefit... > The if/else code is essentially the same as yours. Splitting out the > flags that are common between your two options makes the code more > readable. There is also the issue that code in rc.d scripts shouldn't > run unconditionally, but I don't regard that as critical in this case > since you're just setting variables. > > Ultimately it's up to you whether you want to accept the patches or > not. I think they're useful but I am not going to make a stink about it. The *rest* of the patch is very useful. Thank you :) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no