From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 17 10:20:02 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7175F10656BC
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:20:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru)
Received: from nmail.nevosoft.ru (nmail.nevosoft.ru [78.108.89.51])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26FC88FC19
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:20:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru)
Received: from oleg.net.nevosoft.ru (unknown [195.182.128.54])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by nmail.nevosoft.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1672B63EC12
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:20:00 +0400 (MSD)
From: Oleg Ginzburg <oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru>
Organization: NevoSoft
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:19:46 +0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (FreeBSD/8.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.2.0; i386; ; )
References: <200904161900.42681.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru>
	<200904171047.56671.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru>
	<49E8556F.3090505@quip.cz>
In-Reply-To: <49E8556F.3090505@quip.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200904171419.47519.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru>
Subject: Re: a little confuse with case-sensitive name ports and multiple
	ports with same name
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:20:03 -0000

On Friday 17 April 2009 14:09:51 Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Oleg Ginzburg wrote:
> > And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco:
> > both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco.
> >
> > cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco
> > make install
> > ...
> > (i have deco archivers)
> > pkg_add -r deco
> >
> > (deco/NC-clone replace /usr/local/bin/deco)
> >
> >  pkg_which /usr/local/bin/deco
> > [Updating the pkgdb <format:bdb_btree> in /var/db/pkg ... - 718 packages
> > found (-1 +1) (...). done]
> > deco-3.9_4 deco-1.6
> >
> > pkg_delete -f deco-3.9\*
>
> Can you open a PR for this problem? I think it is really bad. If two
> ports are installing same files, then there must be set CONFLICTS in
> Makefile.

Ok.

>
> The next thing is that I think there should not be the two ports with
> the same name.

IMHO, soon or later, problems like that will be surface is frequency . More 
so, a package numbers is increase day by day. May be location like 
/usr/local/bin/*  most certainly controlling by some stuff through 
analyzing/scanning pkg-plist files for stop potential collision?

>
> Miroslav Lachman