From owner-freebsd-standards Tue May 28 20:32:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (wall-gw.polstra.com [206.213.73.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D159737B403 for ; Tue, 28 May 2002 20:32:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from strings.polstra.com (strings.polstra.com [206.213.73.20]) by wall.polstra.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g4T3WZp56942; Tue, 28 May 2002 20:32:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.1 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20020529034849.A30428@chiark.greenend.org.uk> Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 20:32:35 -0700 (PDT) Organization: Polstra & Co., Inc. From: John Polstra To: Tony Finch Subject: Re: Q&D implementation of dlfunc() Cc: standards@freebsd.org, Garrett Wollman Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Garrett, your patch looks fine to me. I do agree with Tony, though, that it would be better to use a unique struct as the argument. Actually I think I'd prefer a pointer to the unique struct, but it doesn't really make any difference. Tony Finch wrote: > What does "Q&D" mean? Probably quick & dirty. John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message