Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 18:37:47 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PCIOCGETCONF/PCIOCREAD requires write permission? Message-ID: <3A334EEB.5833CE81@newsguy.com> References: <3A333CE4.5B9FDA92@newsguy.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012021342100.5019-100000@zeppo.feral.com> <200012080707.AAA12102@freeway.dcfinc.com> <20001208115004.B81619@dragon.nuxi.com> <200012100901.CAA27464@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh wrote: > > In message <3A333CE4.5B9FDA92@newsguy.com> "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: > : ported to every hardware platform under sun, and we do not go out of our > : way to provide security. Thus, NetBSD and OpenBSD have the edge on us on > > What? I don't see how you can say that about security... We don't go *out* of our way. And just because OpenBSD has an *edge*, that doesn't mean said edge is all that big. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@the.great.underground.bsdconpiracy.org "The bronze landed last, which canceled that method of impartial choice." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A334EEB.5833CE81>