From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 4 11:13:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BAB316A4DE for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:13:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (jojo.ms-net.de [84.16.236.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC2B43D49 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:13:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (p54A5ECE0.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.236.224]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k74AxVXi047326; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:59:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) by Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k74BDYqm066864; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:13:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:15:17 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060804131517.4b43311c@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <200608031248.k73CmOws037728@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <20060802192507.GB1136@roadrunner.aventurien.local> <200608031248.k73CmOws037728@lurza.secnetix.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.4.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 11:38:49 +0000 Cc: olli@lurza.secnetix.de Subject: Re: absolute vs. relative offsets in disklabel X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 11:13:33 -0000 Quoting Oliver Fromme (Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:48:24 +0200 (CEST)): > But then again, harddisks tend to get bigger, so there is > probably not much need for a shrinkfs tool. Sometimes it's not an availability decision... think about EMC, disk pools and changing requirements in an environment where the decision makers know enough to use their desktop system. Bye, Alexander. -- "Maybe you can't understand this, but I finally found what I need to be happy, and it's not friends, it's things." -Fry http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137