From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed May 2 11:50: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0CB37B423 for ; Wed, 2 May 2001 11:50:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f42Io2H63216; Wed, 2 May 2001 11:50:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 11:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200105021850.f42Io2H63216@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Eric Jacoboni Subject: Re: conf/26774: Installation of rmail, even without sendmail Reply-To: Eric Jacoboni Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR conf/26774; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eric Jacoboni To: Brian Candler Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/26774: Installation of rmail, even without sendmail Date: 02 May 2001 20:23:05 +0200 >>>>> "Brian" == Brian Candler writes: Brian> If you're in a pinch, try the one bundled with Brian> the Postfix source code in the auxiliary directory. Some day Brian> Postfix may have its own rmail command." Ok i will give it a try... Brian> Personally I think it should be the responsibility of a Brian> well-behaved MTA to provide an rmail workalike, and if the user Brian> specifies NO_SENDMAIL then they really don't want any part of Brian> sendmail, including its rmail (which is arguably Brian> sendmail-specific anyway) I think too. May be the Postfix port should insist on it... -- Éric Jacoboni, né il y a 1292192266 secondes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message