From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 05:31:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6EE16A4D0 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 05:31:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk [194.200.93.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3491A43D45 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 05:31:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from petefrench@keithprowse.com) Received: from petefrench by dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1AhU4l-000AwO-Ok; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:31:51 +0000 To: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua, itetcu@apropo.ro In-Reply-To: <20040116145335.G39895@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:31:51 +0000 cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports sup tag (was: Re: ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:31:57 -0000 > None. But if you want the snap-shot of 5.2R's ports why cvsup ? The > cvsup will get you nothing. That rather depends on what you are cvsupping from. I had 4.9 ports tree, I wanted 5.2 ports tree. I thought cvs might be a reasonable way to get it! wish I'd never mentioned it now... -pcf.