Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:35:44 +0200 From: Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Curious about SCM choice Message-ID: <20080628073544.GA45690@tirith.brixandersen.dk> In-Reply-To: <7D28014A-C3FB-4944-95FC-15F299F9AF37@cyberlifelabs.com> References: <E2C84A13-15E7-4BFE-B44F-A4C27966188C@cyberlifelabs.com> <48647AAD.5040909@FreeBSD.org> <7D28014A-C3FB-4944-95FC-15F299F9AF37@cyberlifelabs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:12:50AM -0700, Milo Hyson wrote: > The only real benefits I saw in distributed systems were private branchin= g=20 > and offline work. The former seems like it could be achieved in Subversio= n=20 > by creating semi-private user directories like FreeBSD does. As for the= =20 > latter, while it's sometimes unavoidable (e.g. working on an airplane)=20 > isn't something we really want to encourage. The latter (offline work) can also be done with SVN by using the SVK [1] frontend. Brix [1]: http://svk.bestpractical.com/view/HomePage --=20 Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@FreeBSD.org> --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: GnuPG signed iEYEARECAAYFAkhl6c8ACgkQv+Q4flTiePjgZACdFEF/5tHirzqYyngYfZFCmgdI hMEAnRQnBYjMiQ9jGrkDLRAKCaYDAbgT =nmY/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080628073544.GA45690>