From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 31 04:23:17 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698371065676;
	Wed, 31 Aug 2011 04:23:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.214.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93488FC15;
	Wed, 31 Aug 2011 04:23:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkat8 with SMTP id t8so504228bka.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=SquyJlOMa8UvOZ0sRQmLllEhwc/XZm7akrcJHU6pLqg=;
	b=jQ1GN2TjKyJeyKM76PrCrd7mAjYdzDHWpSVk2SiABAsxBuHHE6DKn5+PiuyL4v7I/8
	SjNkaf/Y05tCNGXz4qMCynCdPuSsYCINaGIE8rlTLbStCPQxMiiJxIHsIsBbX5umvh1K
	kpZgPG6Zlx+//PtXrmEUkAc11tyLTV7EXOrfc=
Received: by 10.204.130.129 with SMTP id t1mr610225bks.231.1314764595631;
	Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from limbo.lan ([195.225.157.86])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i11sm89479bkw.4.2011.08.30.21.23.14
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E5DB730.3070908@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:23:12 +0300
From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386;
	rv:6.0) Gecko/20110829 Thunderbird/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@gmail.com>
References: <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com>
	<201108300929.51810.hselasky@c2i.net>
	<4E5CA9BE.2020005@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<CAE-mSOLu-ZkKGw6f01T1NDHTmeVDaAXmicrDzaEaqXdyg7ggCg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE-mSOLu-ZkKGw6f01T1NDHTmeVDaAXmicrDzaEaqXdyg7ggCg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>,
	freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>,
	Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
Subject: Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 04:23:17 -0000

30.08.2011 12:23, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> [Taking random email.]
>
> I think we could merge the $subj web page with this one (which is
> more actual, as of 7.0): http://www.freebsd.org/features.html
>

The pages serve different purposes. There's no point in elaborating 
about feature X if feature X support doesn't differ from other OS 
implementation. And we should focus on major differences, not just any 
other feature.

Despite we are a company of enthusiasts most enthusiasts once in a 
lifetime come to the problem of explaining why this OS is better than 
other or why we shouldn't count on FreeBSD yet.

-- 
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.