From owner-freebsd-small Wed Mar 14 15:47: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from gargoyle.apana.org.au (gargoyle-xl0.apana.org.au [210.215.3.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA0737B719 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:47:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dougy@gargoyle.apana.org.au) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by gargoyle.apana.org.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA35692 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:47:11 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dougy@gargoyle.apana.org.au) Received: from bryden.apana.org.au(203.3.126.129), claiming to be "roadrunner" via SMTP by gargoyle.apana.org.au, id smtpdd35689; Thu Mar 15 09:47:08 2001 Message-ID: <0c1801c0ace1$30e7f1a0$817e03cb@apana.org.au> From: "Doug Young" To: Subject: functional differences between variants Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:47:52 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've read the various README's at http://www.freebsd.org/picobsd, but can't discern any significant difference between the content of the different versions of picoBSD. eg they all appear to support ppp & NICS, so what gives ?? Some postings to the mailing list archives suggest that one needs all the versions available because "ee" is only on one version, however there are conflicting postings on the issue of firewall support ..... apart from those items there doesn't appear to be anything explicit on what differs. Also, is there a reason why picoBSD development still appears to be concentrated on older versions of FreeBSD instead of something in the 4.x line ?? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message