From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Dec  1 16:46: 6 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from io.yi.org (unknown [24.70.218.157])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 564D437B402; Fri,  1 Dec 2000 16:46:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from io.yi.org (localhost.gvcl1.bc.wave.home.com [127.0.0.1])
	by io.yi.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1BA5EBA7C; Fri,  1 Dec 2000 16:46:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: thr_sleep() and thr_wakeup() 
In-Reply-To: Message from John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> 
   of "Fri, 01 Dec 2000 15:53:28 PST." <XFMail.001201155328.jhb@FreeBSD.org> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 16:46:04 -0800
From: Jake Burkholder <jburkhol@home.com>
Message-Id: <20001202004605.1BA5EBA7C@io.yi.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Can we kill these syscalls?  They are not used anywhere in the kernel and
> although they have wrapper functions in libc, no header contains prototypes for
> these wrappers.  According to the CVS log they were originally brought in for
> POSIX threads and AIO, neither of which use this facility.  Comments?
> 

Seconded.  I see no reason for keeping these.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message