From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 19:10:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from green.homeunix.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD9616A4CE; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:10:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from green.homeunix.org (green@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.homeunix.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6QJA5HW097495; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:10:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Received: (from green@localhost) by green.homeunix.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6QJA5tG097494; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:10:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from green) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:10:04 -0400 From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20040726191004.GC96815@green.homeunix.org> References: <1090718450.2020.4.camel@illusion.com> <200407251112.46183.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <1090790611.4628.1.camel@illusion.com> <20040726152151.GC1473@green.homeunix.org> <20040726114142.E32601@pooker.samsco.org> <20040726175219.GA96815@green.homeunix.org> <20040726121005.D32601@pooker.samsco.org> <20040726181821.GB96815@green.homeunix.org> <20040726125328.L32601@pooker.samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040726125328.L32601@pooker.samsco.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: current@freebsd.org cc: bugghy Subject: Re: magic sysrq keys functionality X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:10:06 -0000 On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 12:54:39PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > > I think it would be prudent to add a nice fat "WARNING:" printf to the > > boot process. It's really not obvious that FreeBSD defaults to having > > your hard drives run "unsafely," even though it is usually faster. > > > > I think that this was discussed too. The problem is that Linux and > Windows also silently default to having it on, and breaking from that > status quo causes too much haertburn. The status quo of FreeBSD and Linux shouldn't really apply to FreeBSD... we're supposed to be about stability and correctness. -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\