From owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 27 07:33:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0098C16A4CE for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 07:33:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web90104.mail.scd.yahoo.com (web90104.mail.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.94.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB73443D1D for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 07:33:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from urgaolong@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040527143146.41320.qmail@web90104.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Received: from [61.187.54.13] by web90104.mail.scd.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 27 May 2004 15:31:46 BST Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 15:31:46 +0100 (BST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Gao=20Long?= To: David Johnson In-Reply-To: <200405262039.28752.david@usermode.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LibH or Anaconda ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated to libh code development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 14:33:07 -0000 David Johnson wrote: Except that there is absolutely no reason to use RPM! We already have our own package format that does everything RPM does and more. And without several of the disadvantages. Converting Anaconda's Perl scripts to use the pkg tools instead of rpm should be a rather trivial. The major problems are elsewhere. -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org Well , the anaconda is not a set of scripts of Perl , but Python , they look alike , but are different. So , if the package format has already been decided and coded into anaconda , what else is so important ? --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now