From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 17:05:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59732106564A for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:05:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xen@komadev.de) Received: from zim.freshx.de (zim.freshx.de [83.137.99.113]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1864A8FC1F for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:05:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xen@komadev.de) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zim.freshx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A138C0199 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:05:21 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zim.freshx.de Received: from zim.freshx.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zim.freshx.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V8X-1ZktHSk1 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:05:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from zim.freshx.de (zim.freshx.de [192.168.92.113]) by zim.freshx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47AD8C0198 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:05:18 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:05:18 +0100 (CET) From: Kai Mosebach To: freebsd-xen Message-ID: <27423886.41631234285518798.JavaMail.root@zim.freshx.de> In-Reply-To: <20984507.41581234284966568.JavaMail.root@zim.freshx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [83.76.218.55] X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.11_GA_2695.RHEL5 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Mac)/5.0.11_GA_2695.RHEL5) Subject: domU performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:05:22 -0000 Hi, just as a note, since it is not important in the current state, i guess (but maybe you might have some tweaking tips) Testing the raw performance on my domU (r188436 compiled without WITNESS) seems to fall behind a Linux domU on the same machine: BSD8 Reading: # dd if=/dev/ad0s1 bs=1024k | cpipe -vt -b 65535 | cat >/dev/null ... thru: 1200.000ms at 53.3MB/s ( 57.3MB/s avg) 2.2GB ... 2401239040 bytes transferred in 40.000000 secs (60030976 bytes/sec) BSD8 Writing : # dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024k | cpipe -vt -b 65535 |dd of=/bigfile ... thru: 4400.000ms at 14.5MB/s ( 13.2MB/s avg) 2.8GB ... 3044998656 bytes transferred in 222.500000 secs (13685387 bytes/sec) On the Linux side i get Linux Reading (~15% faster): # dd if=/dev/sda bs=1024k | cat | dd of=/dev/null 4870635520 bytes (4.9 GB) copied, 73.7775 seconds, 66.0 MB/s Linux Writing: (~90% faster) # dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024k | cat | dd of=/root/test2 2473590784 bytes (2.5 GB) copied, 98.9709 seconds, 25.0 MB/s cheers Kai