From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 11 08:37:08 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA26745 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 08:37:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA26734 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 08:37:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.1/8.9.1) id RAA64972; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 17:36:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: "Matthew D. Fuller" Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rwhod patch References: <199901040159.TAA23631@mortis.futuresouth.com> <199901040200.SAA29570@freefall.freebsd.org> <19990110220932.B24234@futuresouth.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 11 Jan 1999 17:36:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: "Matthew D. Fuller"'s message of "Sun, 10 Jan 1999 22:09:32 -0600" Message-ID: Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Matthew D. Fuller" writes: > I submitted a PR (bin/9301) about a week ago, which contained a patch to > implement a listen mode to rwhod. > It's a fairly trivial and noncontroversial change (I'd think; though the > status quo on widespread issues would seem to refuse that there IS such a > thing as a noncontroversial change). What are the chances of getting > this reviewed and possibly committed before the Day-O-Branching? Quite high now that I've seen this :) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message