Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 23:44:53 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: sroberts@dsl.pipex.com Cc: dan@slightlystrange.org, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Request for proof of sendmail config procedure Message-ID: <20020909204453.GN28799@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <1031602026.345.19.camel@Demon.vickiandstacey.com> References: <1031506596.16286.89.camel@Demon.vickiandstacey.com> <20020909102727.GA3392@catflap.home.slightlystrange.org> <1031595414.345.14.camel@Demon.vickiandstacey.com> <20020909184157.GA5228@catflap.home.slightlystrange.org> <1031602026.345.19.camel@Demon.vickiandstacey.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2002-09-09 21:07, Stacey Roberts <stacey@Demon.vickiandstacey.com> wrote: > I could indeed run a caching nameserver on my local net, and configure > sendmail afterwards. One further question though, would it be possible / > prudent to run bind for this purpose chrooted? > > I browsing the handbook, its pretty obvious that some measure of > securing bind might well be warranted. Another layer of security can't really hurt, can it? -- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve -- http://www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020909204453.GN28799>