Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:50:52 +0100 From: RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A portupgrade question Message-ID: <200604242050.57732.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> In-Reply-To: <4166.194.201.68.18.1145879418.squirrel@www.firebadger.net> References: <200604242043.25020.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> <200604242046.42039.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> <4166.194.201.68.18.1145879418.squirrel@www.firebadger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 24 April 2006 12:50, Richard Collyer wrote: > On Mon, April 24, 2006 12:16 pm, Ian Moore wrote: > > On Monday 24 April 2006 20:43, Ian Moore wrote: > >> Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened > >> with it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has been > >> upgraded, > >> I've run portupgrade -a to upgrade a bunch of ports, including libgda. > >> > >> <snip> > > I always use portupgrade -aR to make sure dependencies are done. However > with mysql I find that portupgrade is not the best. > -a, -ra, -Ra and -RrA all do *exactly* the same thing.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200604242050.57732.list-freebsd-2004>