From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 12:36:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A0116A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:36:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao10.cox.net (lakermmtao10.cox.net [68.230.240.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF19943D54 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:36:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from gateway.localnet.net ([68.11.71.51]) by lakermmtao10.cox.net ESMTP <20040624123407.PBQN25843.lakermmtao10.cox.net@gateway.localnet.net> for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:34:07 -0400 Received: from dolphin.localnet.net (dolphin.localnet.net [192.168.1.100]) by gateway.localnet.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5OCY6Dq002790 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 07:34:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from dolphin.localnet.net (localhost.localnet.net [127.0.0.1]) by dolphin.localnet.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5OCY60P025704 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 07:34:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@dolphin.localnet.net) Received: (from conrads@localhost) by dolphin.localnet.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5OCY6um025703 for freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 07:34:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.5 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 07:34:06 -0500 (CDT) Organization: A Rag-Tag Band of Drug-Crazed Hippies From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Is pan2 an orphaned port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: conrads@cox.net List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:36:56 -0000 Just wondering, if no one is currently officially assigned to maintain pan2, I'd be willing to take it on. The latest version on the website now is 0.14.2.91, which has been available for quite some time now. Should I go ahead and have a go at submitting a port update? -- Conrad J. Sabatier -- "In Unix veritas"