From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 8 02:30:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9BC16A4CF; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 02:30:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6F043D46; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 02:30:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (blackwater.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C6C2BD7B; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 12:30:08 +1000 (EST) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 4B4DE511FA; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 12:00:06 +0930 (CST) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 12:00:06 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Warner Losh Message-ID: <20040908023006.GS82881@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <200409071519.i87FJe69032699@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Er1qpsOqk0l6oMce" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200409071519.i87FJe69032699@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 src/share/mk bsd.subdir.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 02:30:11 -0000 --Er1qpsOqk0l6oMce Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday, 7 September 2004 at 15:19:40 +0000, Warner Losh wrote: > imp 2004-09-07 15:19:40 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > . Makefile.inc1 > share/mk bsd.subdir.mk > Log: > Although 'Unanimous Consent' appears to be a well defined and used in > the US Senate, Canadian Parliament and Australian Senate, it was > causing some confusion. Indeed, including the notion that it's used in the Australian Senate. You'll recall the discussions that the South Australian Senate understands the term, but they don't use it. To quote the December 2003 core report: - grog reports a discussion with a member of the SA Senate. The term "unanimous consent" is not used in Australian politics, and it could be interpreted both ways. Any interpretation would be subject to quorum requirements. > After some consultation with Mark Murray, change this to 'without > objection' since often times a plain-speaking term is preferable > to a regionally used term. Great! Thanks. Greg -- Note: I discard all HTML mail unseen. Finger grog@FreeBSD.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --Er1qpsOqk0l6oMce Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBPm6uIubykFB6QiMRAmuEAJ9kDUd3rB8ZZMBgTY6tFRZQ94XinACfY3+9 Hh9XNEDSQWTW7e3rWlJiLLA= =TpOo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Er1qpsOqk0l6oMce--