From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 15 12:03:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8647E1065686 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:03:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F4F8FC0A for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id PAA29759; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:03:07 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Message-ID: <4C3EF8FA.4080005@icyb.net.ua> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:03:06 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100517) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oliver Fromme References: <201007151158.o6FBwJI8066822@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <201007151158.o6FBwJI8066822@lurza.secnetix.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 8.1-PRERELEASE: CPU packages not detected correctly X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:03:15 -0000 on 15/07/2010 14:58 Oliver Fromme said the following: > Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Could you please try to do the following? > > 1. Fetch topo-12212009.tar from the top of this page: > > http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-64-architecture-processor-topology-enumeration/ > > 2. Untar it and apply this patch to the code: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/cpu-topology.diff > > 3. Compile it by running sh mk_64.sh (supposing you have amd64 system installed) > > 4. Run cpu_topology64.out and report back its output. > > Ok, did that. This tool seems to get it right, i.e. it > detects 2 packages with 4 cores each. Here's the output: Great! So perhaps you can now test jkim's patch posted in this thread? -- Andriy Gapon