From owner-freebsd-commit  Sat Sep 16 19:14:26 1995
Return-Path: owner-commit
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA16848
          for freebsd-commit-outgoing; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 19:14:26 -0700
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA16827
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 19:14:22 -0700
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA16811
          for cvs-bin-outgoing; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 19:14:18 -0700
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA16793
          ; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 19:14:04 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id TAA14217; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 19:12:18 -0700
Message-Id: <199509170212.TAA14217@precipice.shockwave.com>
To: davidg@Root.COM
cc: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@kryten.Atinc.COM>, cvs-bin@freefall.freebsd.org,
        CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/rmail rmail.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 16 Sep 1995 18:17:46 PDT."
             <199509170117.SAA00141@corbin.Root.COM> 
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 19:12:16 -0700
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: owner-commit@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I agree 100%.  It makes even more hair on the back of my neck stand up
when I see changes to 2.2 put into stable right away (unless they're
things to fix builds et al).

     The side effects of the rmail patch may not be completely benign. I'd like
  to see this one tested in some real environments before putting it into 2.1.
  I don't know if this kind of testing will happen before the 2.1 release (I
  don't think so).
  
  -DG