From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 03:54:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C0916A4DA; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 03:54:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from ylpvm29.prodigy.net (ylpvm29-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C4543D72; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 03:54:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) X-ORBL: [67.119.74.222] Received: from [10.0.0.53] (adsl-67-119-74-222.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [67.119.74.222]) by ylpvm29.prodigy.net (8.13.7 out spool5000 dk/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7N3sVAX004581; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:54:32 -0400 Message-ID: <44EBD160.90303@root.org> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:54:08 -0700 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Boris Samorodov References: <20060820110545.GG1066@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <94951745@bsam.ru> <20060822090859.GO96644@cell.sick.ru> <20060822093823.GB743@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <69974160@bsam.ru> In-Reply-To: <69974160@bsam.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Peter Jeremy , freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff Subject: Re: Powerd makes computer hang X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 03:54:43 -0000 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:38:23 +1000 Peter Jeremy wrote: > >> On Tue, 2006-Aug-22 13:08:59 +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: >>> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:57:02PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: >>> B> Glebius@ (CCed) sent me a patch against 6-STABLE which solves the >>> B> problem. However, I don't know if the patch was committed. >>> >>> If that was a patch that was required for merging the em(4) changes, >>> then the answer is "yes". It was merged to STABLE. > >> In that case, my problem is different. I have bge(4), not em(4). > > You shouldn't delete the quoting. ;-) > > So, those patches (needed to _merge_ the em(4) changes) are really for > the acpi subsystem. I had a freezing notebook after updating to > 6.1-RELEASE and found out that the recent acpi changes are to blame. Can you point me to this commit? I browsed the sys/dev/acpica and sys/i386/acpica tree and fail to see a commit by glebius@. -- Nate