From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 15:12:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F9816A49E for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:12:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.176.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92FE843D79 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:10:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz) (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id kBEFC1pI030504 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:12:01 +0100 (CET) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.8/8.13.3/Submit) id kBEFC1fY030503; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:12:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:12:01 +0100 From: Divacky Roman To: Scot Hetzel Message-ID: <20061214151201.GB27798@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <790a9fff0612140401h7bf0bdb0idb1590120ae95e3f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0612140401h7bf0bdb0idb1590120ae95e3f@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 147.229.176.14 Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linuxolator: proc/filesystems implementation X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:12:10 -0000 On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 06:01:27AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote: > Linux has a file in the procfs that shows all the loaded filesystem modules. > > I have implemented the function that fills this file using the linprocfs > module. thnx for the work but does this help anything? I cannot imagine that linux software that expects (lets say) "fat32" module can be able to cope with "msdosfs". you can either implement a translation table or forget it :) why did you chose to implement this? any particular case where it helps? roman