From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 14 00:20:57 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA11485 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 14 May 1997 00:20:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pppmail.appliedtheory.com (pppmail.appliedtheory.com [204.168.16.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA11473 for ; Wed, 14 May 1997 00:20:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [204.168.68.212] by pppmail.appliedtheory.com (8.6.12/3.1.090690-Applied Theory Communications) id DAA16057; Wed, 14 May 1997 03:24:29 -0400 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <19970514025749.AAA26640@jeffalla> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 03:22:23 +0100 To: From: Ken McKittrick Subject: Are these netstat #'s okay??? Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hello I'm setting up a tucows mirror, it's using about 50% of a 768K Frac T-1. I'm seeing about 8-10% collisions is this normal/okay? Even acceptable? The network is 10Base-T (20 feet) to a Kinston Hub then a Cisco 2501 router. I just got my FreeBSD 2.2.1 system up and running 48 MEg Ram 1.6 Gig IDE drive and 2.0 Gig IDE drive. Ethernet adapter is PCI card made by Kingston. -> netstat -i Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll de0 1500 00.c0.f0.14.f9.7f 330456 0 186901 0 13665 de0 1500 baldcom-net ZONE 330456 0 186901 0 13665 lp0* 1500 0 0 0 0 0 tun0* 1500 0 0 0 0 0 sl0* 552 0 0 0 0 0 lo0 16384 20128 0 20128 0 0 lo0 16384 loopback-net LOC -> iostat 5 120 tty wd0 wd2 cpu tin tout sps tps msps sps tps msps us ni sy in id 0 25 3 0 16.5 13 0 9.1 0 0 0 0 99 0 11 0 0 0.0 51 0 0.0 1 0 0 0 98 0 11 0 0 0.0 127 1 0.0 2 0 1 2 96 0 11 29 2 13.3 51 2 20.9 0 0 0 1 98 1 85 39 2 15.6 112 2 11.9 1 0 1 1 96 7 more hours and I'll be done Ken Ken McKittrick Technical Consultant kmckittr@appliedtheory.net AppliedTheory Communications, Inc. HTML Writers Guild