From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 10 13:19:27 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA05062 for current-outgoing; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 13:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA04967 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 13:19:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id WAA09359 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 22:18:53 +0200 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id WAA04684 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 22:18:53 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.7.5/8.6.9) id VAA01147 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 21:54:52 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199604101954.VAA01147@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: routed delete my PPP default: how to fight it? (THE REASON FOUND!) To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 21:54:51 +0200 (MET DST) Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199604092043.AAA01084@astral.msk.su> from "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" at Apr 10, 96 00:43:47 am X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= wrote: > It seems that I found the reason: > when I comment out this line in my ppp.conf > > # add 0 0 194.58.227.1 > > I don't have those 'router' service messages anymore! > So, it is DEFINITELY iij-ppp who produce this UDP router requests. > > But... I forced to manually enter 'route add default ...' in this case. :-( Also with add 0 194.58.227.XXX 194.58.227.1 ? The option to allow for 0 as the local address has been added recently, it used to only work as specified above for a long time, at least with -auto. Perhaps this change wasn't done correctly? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)